• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I saw a documentary about a guy trying to find a “humane” execution method, he came to the conclusion that suffocation with nitrogen gas probably was the least bad.

    It doesn’t trigger a feeling of panic as CO2 poisoning does, you simply drift away in a hypoxic high filled with mild confusion without the dread.

    People on both sides of the death penalty issue thought is was barbaric, proponents of the death penalty thought it was wrong to remove the suffering from the person, they felt it would be wrong to let say a serial killer just drift away in a high, while opponents of the death penalty felt it was barbaric as it would lessen the felt impact of taking a life and might cause governments to reinstate the death penalty.

    It was an interesting documentary…

    • Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      ·
      10 months ago

      That was one of Louis Theroux’s phenomenal docos.

      He was super confused at the end when he was met with “but we want to hurt them” it was a bit funny how jarring it was, but also really sad.

        • PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Synopsis:

          Former Conservative MP, Michael Portillo pushes his body to the brink of death in an investigation into the science of execution.

          As the American Supreme Court examines whether the lethal injection is causing prisoners to die in unnecessary pain Michael sets out to find a solution which is fundamentally humane. To do so he examines the key methods of execution available today: he discovers why convicts can catch on fire in the electric chair, learns how easy it is to botch a hanging and inhales a noxious gas to experience first hand the terror of the gas chamber.

          Armed with some startling evidence Michael considers a completely new approach. Will it be the answer? There is only one way of finding out - to experience it himself.

    • snooggums@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      If done right, sure.

      Alabama tried to kill the person first in line already with lethal injection and failed, so the odds of them doing nitrogen gas right is pretty fucking slim.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’d have to fuck it up to a truly astonishing degree for it to be anywhere near as bad as a failed execution using the other methods currently in use. Like maybe use chlorine gas instead of nitrogen.

        • snooggums@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          They just need to not have good seals on the mask so non-nitrogen air leaks in which would give the same symptoms as slow suffocation.

          Note that they keep fucking up to an astonishing degree, so it is likely to happen with any method they try.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            No. It would either work more slowly or it wouldn’t work. There would be no pain.

            The feeling of suffocation comes from a buildup of CO2 in the body, not from a lack of oxygen.

            Since regular air is pretty close to 80/20 nitrogen and oxygen, simply removing the oxygen results in a painless, odorless death.

            It’s actually a concern for people using rebreathers. If the CO2 scrubber keeps working but new oxygen isn’t introduced into the system, the diver will go from feeling fine to passing out without ever knowing it.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Air leaks means that the co2 is not going to be efficiently removed, and your example of a diver is actually supporting the point that the seal needs to be really good for it to be effective. Note that the person drifting off in an execution knows they are dying which is different than just drifting off unknowingly. Painless doesn’t mean it isn’t causing stress from the knowledge of imminent death.

              Plus the underlying context of the state fucking up all of their execution methods shows they will fuck this up too. It doesn’t matter how good the method is in theory when they are incompetent.

              • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                You really don’t know what you’re talking about here.

                A poor mask seal won’t cause them to inhale enough of their exhaled CO2 unless they’re also putting a bag over their head, and the level of atmospheric CO2 doesn’t cause the sensation of suffocation, otherwise you’d feel like you were suffocating at all times.

                The death penalty is barbaric, but if you’re going to do it, this is the least-painful method, and one in which botching the execution simply results in nothing happening, as opposed to ther methods where it causes pain and injury.

                Yes, the psychological pain/stress isn’t alleviated by nitrogen. I personally think the biggest improvement they could make (aside from abolising the death penalty) would be to do it without a mask in a hyperbaric chamber where the elevated partial pressure of nitrogen would result in nitrogen narcosis and may relieve some of the stress.

                • snooggums@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  A poor seal affects air going in and being pulled out, because the outside air can flow past the air next to the mouth and down the exit tube without going through the person’s lungs. Especially if the faulty seal is on the exit tube connections, which is the kind of fuck up that the state is fully capable of doing.

                  Without that circulation, they will keep breathing the same air, which will build up CO2.

                  The system is complex and you apparently assume it is simple and comparable to a room full of nitrogen. The mask is actually more complex.

                  You clearly don’t know what you are talking about.

                  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    10 months ago

                    I’m not talking out of my ass because I read some random opinions online. Are you a University lecturer that teaches courses on the medical effects of pressurized gasses? I am. Do you have certification granting you authority to service and inspect medical gas systems, regulators, full-face masks, and pressure vessels? I do.

                    A blocked exhalation valve and a bad seal are not the same thing. They’re actually the opposite, though a blocked valve can result in a bad seal as the pressure inside the mask inceases. But the escaping high-pressure gas will result in a venturi effect that will pull away the exhaled gasses.

                    It’s actually harder to screw it up with a mask versus a room because the small volume of air compared to the necessary rate of flow causes the air to be more turbulent and prevents dead-air spaces. Basically, the incoming nitrogen flushes out the contents of the mask unless the seal is so bad that the nitrogen doesn’t flow in the mask at all, in which case the CO2 escapes into the room through the same shitty seals that don’t contain the Nitrogen.

                    The biggest risk is someone simply forgetting to turn the valve to let in the nitrogen, though that’s dead-simple to prevent with a 1-way gasket that allows outside air in if the pressure in the mask drops below outside pressure (when the victim inhales). Though in that particular case it is important that the CO2 not be allowed to form a dead zone, which is done by having more 1-way gaskets in front of the mouth and nose that doesn’t allow exhaled gasses back.

                    You know - the same high-tech shit they use in the base of $12 snorkels that work for decades in salt water.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            would give the same symptoms as slow suffocation

            If you don’t understand the science, please STFU.

            • snooggums@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              A bad seal means that the co2 is not being removed properly and not being replaced with nitrogen as designed. Plus the person knows they are being killed, which makes the smallest physical symptoms more noticeable since people do notice things they are expecting.

              Being hostile while defending the state that keeps fucking up executions makes you look like an ass.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Man if I were the guy this was first being tested on I would probably try and fuck it up in the worst way possible just to screw with the people executing me.

      Like as soon as the gas turns on start screaming my ass off like they mixed up nitrogen gas with acid gas instead and produced the worst pain ever until I finally passed out.

    • veroxii@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty sure I know which one you’re talking about. Was British… BBC or something… But is on YouTube.

      I remember the scene where he is in a hypoxic state himself in a chamber and he needs to press a big red button or he dies. They kept telling him “press the button or you die” and he was just so high and goofy laughing about it and not pressing the button.

      Very interesting show as you say.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      One night working late a coworker of mine nearly went that way. He was just tired and said he was spacing out. Meanwhile the alarms were blaring.

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      Just wrong. You only drift off if you are unaware that you are suffocating! The person being executed is fully aware that they are dying via suffocation. That person is going to be in full panic mode trying to get as much air into their lungs as possible.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        Pure nitrogen gas is a significant industrial hazard for the reasons you stated. There is sure to be an element of panic since they are aware that they are being executed. That is going to be true whether the execution is being done via hypoxia, injection, or firing squad.

        I suppose it depends on your exact definition of suffocating. You will absolutely be able to take full, satisfying breaths the entire time. If you do not tell them when the gas is turned on, even knowing that it’s coming, they would be unlikely to even notice.

        While there are no clinical studies (for obvious reasons), there is footage of industrial accidents. It seems that people succumb VERY quickly, possibly on their first full breath.

        Most debates around execution methods are about the method itself. They typically exclude the morality and cruelty of the idea of a death penalty in general. I don’t think this one can be separated, though. The concern is that it’s untested for executions, but the only way to test it is to use it for executions. There is ample evidence of its use on livestock, but this is of limited value for humans.

        As a side note, no medical doctors can be involved with executions. It’s a direct violation of the Hippocratic Oath.